Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Records, Toasts, and Trends.

Wow, what's this? Four posts, all in the same month? Sadly, that's practically a record for me. You should all join me in a little toast to my minor achievement...

...Speaking of toast, let's talk food! Food trends, to be precise. Anyone who doesn't really pay attention to the food world may not even realize that our overall eating habits move in trends just the same as any other cultural fashion, but trust me, food trends certainly do exist. I wasn't even alive in the 70s, but I've heard many tales of the fondue-filled fun of the 70s disco decade. It wasn't that long ago either, that sushi was a strange and often off-putting concept, rather than a practical standard dish for anyone of decent culture. And I'm sure everyone remembers the scarcity of bread items during the protein-heavy Atkins diet wave. The examples could go on indefinitely...
But it is a few of the modern food trends that are of particular interest to me. First let us discuss the totally tantalizing thistle that adorns my 'food entry' image, the globe artichoke. I know I'm a little bit behind the curve here, as the 'choke invasion has been happening for quite some time now, but I still couldn't be more excited about artichokes. While there are still some of the more rural parts of America that may not get too much exposure to them, artichokes are everywhere these days. It's almost impossible to find a metropolitan restaurant that doesn't have an artichoke dish of some kind. And for good reason - artichokes are hot sellers these days. Heck, even I can barely overcome the magnetic draw given to a menu description added by the simple words "with artichokes." Artichoke dips, grilled artichokes, deep fried artichokes, stuffed artichokes, artichokes in pasta, and on and on.... Artichokes fit into almost any application you can think of. Great news if you're like me and typically shy away from eating most vegetables. Do yourself a favor and try making an artichoke dish or two at home from fresh ones - they're pretty damn easy to handle once you understand how they're put together.
The other food trend I want to talk about is the pomegranate. Man, is this fruit popular right now. It's showing up just about everywhere in every form aside from home kitchens as a raw, whole pomegranate. It's become especially popular in the drink world. Not only is the juice of this fruit touted as nothing short of a super-healthy miracle elixir, the juice has become the best friend for trendy bartenders at upper-casual restaurants. It makes sense though, the super-strong sweet and tart juice pretty much plays well with anything. Pometinis are already becoming a classic, pomegranate margaritas turn the otherwise blasé drink into an exotic treat, and pomegranate mojitos are an ultra-modern marriage of two hype-heavy drinks. Of course it's not just the juice that's popular, but it's certainly the main attraction. Enticingly-crafted bottles of POM brand juice are a common sight at damn near any grocery store these days. As far as I'm concerned though, those bottles can keep sitting there. Talk about expensive! Yes, they're pretty. And yes, they're popular. But really folks, you can get the same damn stuff for literally half the price in the ethnic section of some upper-scale grocery stores, or for at least slightly less under the Archer Farms imprint at Target stores. You also can always just buy your own fresh pomegranates. A good one will have plenty of natural juices ready to leak out on it's own, and it's not too difficult a venture to further juice one - though I will admit that it's not the easiest thing in the world... It'll even share a little secret for getting the good stuff out of the fruit with minimal damage to it:

If you've never seen a fresh pomegranate before - that's what they look like, inside and out. The waxy red outer hull as well as the pale yellowish-white "walls" inside the fruit are both basically inedible, so the trick is to get the red seed-looking pods (they're called arils, and they're actually seed casings around a small hard seed inside each one) out of the fruit while taking as little of the walls with them. If you search online you'll find a lot of different ways to accomplish the task, but probably two the first as well as most common answers you'll come across are threading and submersion. I've never tried threading, and honestly, I never will. The basic idea is that you sew with a needle and thread through all of the arils and pluck them out on the thread, thus leading all the walls behind. I can't think of a more ridiculous waste of time, so no thanks on that one. Submersion is certainly a good idea, so much so that even Alton Brown (a minor hero of mine) recommends it. It's certainly easier - just get a large bowl of water and crack your fruit open while it's under water. Then gently scoop out the arils with your fingers, and don't worry too much about any of the membrane that breaks loose. The membrane walls will float to the top, ready to be skimmed off, while the tasty arils sink to the bottom. Pretty good, and certainly easy enough... but I'm still not happy with it. Why? Because just think of all that delicious juice that normally would be dripping out now being subtly washed away. Okay okay, so without actually breaking into the arils themselves you're not going to get more than just over half a shot glass worth of juice anyway, but that's more than enough for me to want to save it! So I use the speedy trick I picked up watching Iron Chef and a few other professional chefs - the wooden spoon beating. Couldn't be easier. Cut a pomegranate standing up in half horizontally (you should have a top and bottom half, not two sides) and place one half cut side down on top of your left hand, with your left hand hovering just slightly over the top of a large bowl. Now using your other hand, firmly hit the skin side of the fruit opposite your hand with the flat of a wooden spoon repeatedly. Continue until you've gotten all of the arils and juice out, and then move on to the other half. Bam, there you go. A bowl full of arils, juice, and with about as little pieces of membrane as possible. Yes, it is a little bit messier, but if you're careful and you practice at it, it won't be that much trouble. In the end it's all just a matter of preference of course.
Of course there are plenty of other minor and major food trends I could mention here, but that isn't exactly the point of this entry... I just want to draw attention to the existence of food trends as a whole. Not only to help you get excited about what's happening in the food world out there, but also to help you to not miss out. Food trends are like any other sort of trend - no matter how hot they are now, they eventually fade. Sure, we'll always be eating artichokes and pomegranate and even fondue somewhere in the world, but if you miss out on a food trend that may have tickled your fancy, your potential access to whatever it was may suddenly become considerably less. And then there is the potential to see some new food innovations and have an effect on the market - the food industry is willing to experiment with buzz-worthy items to a point of risking loss, but if you find something you love and actively support it, that once-novelty item like pomegranate ice cream may just make the jump into everyday standard! Most important of all though, is just that following food trends, silly as it may be, is a chance to really get excited about food. I don't know about you, but I'm not content to just consider food the necessary means to life... I want food to be a part of actually experiencing that life. Hope you'll agree, and keep your eyes open and your mouth ready for something new! Happy eating!

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Webcomic Drama!

Damn you Websnark! I truly miss what you once were. The provided link pinpoints exactly why I've fallen out of love with you, but here's a snippet for those who aren't interested in reading two long-winded blog posts today:

"Which brings us to the meat of the subject. I'm not talking about the Webcomics community much these days. I'm not talking about who hates John Solomon or Joey Manley or Scott Kurtz or Penny Arcade or Robert A. Howard and who's defending any of that list to others or who's doing anything like that. I'm not diving into the fray giving my two cents on it or talking about who's being mean or who's being thin skinned or who's right or who's wrong or any of that stuff. And the core reason why is, as stated above, I just don't give a shit any more." -Eric Burns
Well damn... You see, I absolutely love webcomic drama. Hell, I love any stupid drama - I'm a drama hound. Of course I hate to actually have any drama in my life (I've actually spent a lot of effort removing drama-laden people from my world), but it's still one of my favorite spectator sports. And the "webcomics community" has some of the most ridiculously over-blown drama you can find. Am I shallow for this interest? Hell yes I am, I'll admit it. But don't think that I'm any more shallow than most people. Frankly, anyone who watches 90% of what's on television is watching it for the exact same reason I am: because it's fun to spectate on the silly meaningless conflicts and stress in other people lives from a safe distance outside. Whether you watch(ed) 90210, The O.C., Desperate Housewives, House M.D., Bones, Scrubs, or damn near any other non-documentary show, you're into it for the same reason that I thrive on the webcomic scene. Stupid drama. Which brings me back to Websnark. You see, I am what I'd describe as an actively casual webcomic fan. I read quite a lot of them (though I read a good number of those in one monthly digest-like fashion) and have at the very least have some experience with most of the names you'll hear thrown around in the world of webcomics. But, I don't really do the webcomic communities. I don't follow the artists, I don't post and/or read the forums (with only a very few exceptions), and I even most often only skim the accompanying blog posts just in case there is any good drama that catches my eye. But, what I did do was read the webcomic-related Websnark posts. Websnark was my drama-radar. Not only did Eric Burns point me to the juicy fights and hissy fits and whatnot of the comics I cared about, but since he has considerably different tastes than I do, he would even write about the drama over comics I didn't read and thereby would have missed out on entirely! Admittedly, most often Eric had enough tact to not post that much of the actual drama, but he certainly gave me enough info to go and seek out whatever the issue du jour was. But, as Mr. Burns said, he just hasn't been talking about it lately. I understand his aversion to it all - as somebody with a bit of standing in the webcomic world and whose blog has a pretty terrific number of readers, I can imagine that the drama often times encroached into his actual world rather than just being there for him to view from the outside. So I understand him decision to stay out of it, and I respect it. But that doesn't mean I'm not still sad about it. I'm sad not only about missing future stupid drama, but also about knowing that I have already missed plenty. Oh, how much I miss the days of Kris Straub (of Checkerboard Nightmare and Starslip Crisis) delightfully mocking the shit-pile that is Tim Buckley and his trite excuse-for-a-comic Ctrl+Alt+Del (google it if you have to, I refuse to link it). Ah well, I still read all of the webcomic tagged entry at Websnark, even if they are a little less frequent or satisfying. Sorry for such a long post saying so little. But hey, if anyone out there hears any tasty bits of webcomic gossip - don't hesitate to send them my way!

...also, maybe I'm less sad about Websnarks change and more sad about not having Checkerboard Nightmare around anymore. That comic wouldn't have even existed had it not been for drama and other trivial shit out there. Alas.

Friday, August 17, 2007

Let's Talk Politics!


Let's talk about the two-headed beast for awhile today. You know, the twin monster that is the American political machine. Republicans. Democrats. Interchangeable. Honestly, when the political actors from either side are at their best, I can hardly tell the difference between the two. You may as well not even vote since the result is the same either way. Even when parties are at their most polar, such as during the 2000-2008 elections, having only two options is hardly acceptable in my mind. I mean, most of the time it's like choosing between being punched in the face or being kicked in the groin. The populous of America simply can not be truly represented in a two-party system. There are just far too many variables for it to work. For example, probably the two most important issues to me politically are abortion and the death penalty. I'm against the act of murder in both cases, and I'm not willing to compromise on the issues that mean the absolute most to me. Yet voting either Republican or Democrat is being forced to utterly give up on one front to support the other. It's silly. So what does that leave us? The third party vote. You want to make hotheaded political speakers really passionate? Get them to talk about the third party. Political leaders on both sides of the equation are afraid of the third party because it represents a change in the game. As it is now, whether either side comes out slightly ahead at any given point is pretty meaningless - in the long run each side is still going to enjoy the benefits of the power of their positions. Third parties aim to take that comfortable power away from them. Republicans and Democrats both would most often much rather have someone from the opposite party win an election than have a third party take it. So they use the best tactic they can - they act like the independent cause isn't even a threat. They propagate terms like "throwing your vote away" and attempt to undermine independents as silly joke campaigns. And sadly, it works. Most people don't fall in line politically with the two parties, and I'd honestly be willing to bet that most people would find themselves more likely to line up with one of the various additional parties if they were to compare themselves on an issue to issue basis. Yet most people would never be willing to vote third party because they have it in their head that it's a meaningless vote, a throw away. "Obviously Nader's not going to win, so why even waste a vote on him?" Well damnit, of course we're not going to win at first. We have years and years of institution to fight through, and it's going to be an uphill battle. But here's the secret: every single additional vote the third party cause gets makes it that much more of a legitimate option. Some people wouldn't consider voting for a third party unless it already had a rough 10% estimated support. But once it hits that number, they'll willing. And then they take that 10% and with their votes raise it all the way up to 12%. Then the people who weren't willing to "throw their vote away" for a cause with less than 12% of the public supporting it suddenly see it as a viable option, and add their support bringing it up to 15%... You see, all we need is to make tiny advances. Every single time the third parties of America get just a little bit more of the vote than last time, it's a victory. And it's one step closer to finally getting rid of the ridiculousness of our very broken two party system.

And just so you don't think I'm alone in being against the two party system - here's a chunk from George Washington's Farewell Address as our nation's first President:

"I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another."

Sorry About This

This is just the standard "first post testing" post, the one where I post just to see how a post will look on the site... Sorry if you were expecting something more. To be frank though, knowing my blogging track record, I probably won't ever make it past this first post. Somewhat sad, don't you think? All too-often I find myself with these grand ideas of being a real, honest-to-irrelevance "blogger," only to find my attention as well as my available free time far too short. I can't say for certain, but I'm thinking some of the blame may fall on 'themes.' You see, I consider myself an altogether complex person (though I imagine that if you were to ask anyone, they'd probably consider themselves the same), with interests in an extreme assortment of topics and categories. And as far as I'm concerned, almost all of the best blogs I've ever read have been fairly focused: Tales From The Pantry is fantastically devoted to the everyday life of a somewhat forgotten vocation, Josh In Japan would be nothing were it not entirely based in Japanese topics, An Obsession With Food and Orangette get read for covering perhaps my most favorite of topics, and even not-entirely focused Websnark is absolutely at it's best when it zooms in solely on the drama-laden world of webcomics. Bearing that in mind, why shouldn't I be interested in narrowing my focus? So time and time again I've set out to start a highly focused blog to outlet my desire to get my word out into the world. But you know what I've learned? I can't just sit down and write continually on food, or politics, or religion, or music... I get bored and find myself more interested in writing about something altogether unrelated. So let's give this a shot. This is just going to be me. I can't promise it will be good, and I certainly can promise you it will be unfocused and far from any real sense of organization. I wouldn't even really even expect to see more than a few entries here, sadly. But (and yes, I know you shouldn't start a sentence that way), I need to give it a try. I used to run a moderately popular website which highlighted blog-esque rantings, and I've missed the feeling I get from putting my thoughts into text ever sense it's collapse. So if you somehow found yourself here, stick around and give it a chance - hopefully it will be a worthwhile time for you and me both.